Tagesarchiv für den 26.10.2009

The CRE crunch continues claiming victims, with the latest being the Four Seasons Hotel in New York. And while Stuyvesant Town is some dinky little project somewhere on the East side of New York (or so prevailing thought runs), which few care if it goes belly up or not, the fat cats that frequent the opulent hotel on 58th street next to the brothel, pardon, gentlemen's club, which is Tao in all but name, may be a little more concerned about this one. In addition to the Four Seasons, three other luxury hotels, which back a loan sent to a special servicer 10 days ago include the Four Seasons Biltmore Resort in Montecito, the ritzy Las Ventanas in Cabo, the destination of many a banker closing dinner, and the San Ysidro Ranch in Montecito.

The special servicing action has forced S&P to place 15 classes of bonds backed by a $425 million loan to Ty Warner Hotels & Resorts on "credit watch with negative implications." The catalyst for the action and the transition to special servicing was prompted by a staggering drop in cash flows from properties which came 46% below S&P expectations. The loan, which matures in January 2010, and which investors were hoping to recoup full principal on, may now be looking at substantial losses. And due to the declining cash flow, the loan would not qualify for an extension as it is in breach of it debt service coverage ratio.

More indicative of the collapse in the luxury hotel segment is the drop in occupancy for the four properties from 69% in the last fiscal year to a meager 58% recently. Alas the Ty Warner penthouse pictured insert unfortunately does not seem to be seeing a lot of action (if any) these days.

The full blown impact of CRE deterioration on the hotel industry could escalate rapidly: according to RealPoint there are over 1,500 loans with a total balance of nearly $25 billion which may be in danger of default.

The silver lining: REITs now see cap rates at or below 6% in perpetuity... Which unless they are seeing something in the ultraviolet end of the electromagnetic spectrum that is invisible to everyone else, is almost believable.

After the last week or so in the market and todays 1% drubbing, its difficult to remain overly bullish. Just about everybody claims the market is ready for a sizeable pullback and the drops in the SP500 in 5 of the last 7 days seems to bolster those thoughts.According to the recent report from Mark Hulbert, the evidence suggests that the market remains too bearish for a big correction. Hulbert
Paul Hickey

General Electric (GE) Generally Down

General Electric (GE) has now been down 8 days in a row. Since 1980, GE has only had five other 8-day losing streaks. On day 9, the stock has gone up three times and gone down twice. The last two times that the stock has had an 8-day losing streak, it has gone up exactly 2.51% on the next day....





This is the publicly available data from CDC, current up to the end of week 41 (October 11-17, 2009).

CDC Current Weekly FluView Report
Archive of FluView Weekly Reports
CDC Historic Influenza Surveillance Data
Notes on the CDC data:
1. Some years contain a "week 53", the years without week 53 do not have that data point.
2. Some of the years only have data from week 40 to week 20 (approximately the months of October-April).
3. Starting in 2003-2004 influenza season data, the CDC began providing a weighted % ILI value, which is the data used in the plots from 2004 forward. Prior years use the unweighted CDC reported value.
Robert Waldmann

Harry Reid is sending a health care reform bill with a public option and an opt out clause to the floor of the Senate. . Josh Marshall explains why it is good policy and notes "the importance that an outside-the-box idea can have in significantly changing the terms of a major policy debate."

I really think you read it here first. (not saying that it wasn't written somewhere else, but I assume you are an angrybear reader because you are reading this post.

Submitted by Nic Lenoir of ICAP

Asian central banks have left unattended a bunch of pretty upset carry-traders... We had a well-established support line on EURUSD and on Friday when we tested it (for the 5th or 6th time) central banks came to the rescue. However, when we tried to break again this morning, the market awaited... in vain, and with no massive buyers it's a wave of stops that met the swing traders selling the break.

What now? Well it seems on the 180-minute chart that we stopped on the only decent support at 1.4846. As long a we don't break 1.4976 we are in a downtrend which would potentially take us all the way down to the 50-dma and the mediu-term channel support in the 1.4620/1.4660 area. That is the key medium term support.

Drawing a parallel with precious metals, it seems Gold has broken the recent low that was support at 1,043. In very short term trading we hit the support however of a potential sideways channel, and short term indicators are massively oversold, so we could well retrace to 1,052 in the near term. Bigger picture we have two supports at 1,025 and 986. The later is pretty much the key between retracing to 862 and making new highs past 1,100. Look at silver for guidance... Silver just rejected the top of a major channel, that's why medium term we think re-testing 986 seems the likely scenario. A hold there would be very bullish, but we would stay put until then. If we follow through a bit more here on the downside there will be some more stops being triggered.

Equities short-term look like they are supported as indicators are quite oversold on a 30-minute and 60-minute chart. We have good medium-term support in the 5,550/5,650 zone for the Dax, we would expect a bullish reaction near-term.

Good luck trading,

Nic

Infoportal Deutschland u. Globalisierung

Schwarz-Gelb in der Schuldensteilwand: Wann stuerzt Deutschland ab?

n den naechsten Jahren werden die oeffentlichen Schulden Deutschlands fast senkrecht steigen, nach Vorraussage des IWF von 63,4 % des Bruttoinlandsprodukts bis auf 89,3 % in 2013 oder nach neueren Berechnungen der Berliner Senatsverwaltung fuer Finanzen von jetzt 1,6 bis auf 2,1 Billionen Euro oder 94 % der jaehrlichen Wirtschaftsleistung.
Molecool

Skeptical Bear Monday Rub Down

It was a good day for the bears, but yes, I’m a bit skeptical here. Why? First up we pressed against the multi-month support line but did not breach it with conviction - the bulls were able to make a stand thus far. Of course we could see a large gap to the downside and I’m sure that’s the trade many rats were taking today. But wouldn’t that be a bit too easy? Perhaps I’ve become a bit too paranoid - possible but you can’t survive in this racket without a healthy amount of caution. But the real reason why I’m still cautious here is the Zero Lite today:

What I see is a slight divergence here - is this really what we should see if we’re embarking on a big drop? I’m just not convinced yet. Maybe this is nothing and we’re in Primary {3} with more downside to come this week. Or this is yet another bear trap as suggested by Berk’s fractal as well as my Euro left chart this morning.

Program Trading Update:

evil.rat/ES: -2.5
evil.rat/NQ: -2.25
resident.evil/ES: -.75
resident.evil/NQ: -7.5
geronimo/ES: -11.5

A truly horrible day for all black boxes today. On the geronimo side we will implement a change that most subs will find very welcome as it contains the emergency parachute plus a tightened stop. More on that subject later - the new version will either be available tomorrow morning or on Wednesday morning. I will shoot out a message to all geronimo subs when the update has been put into production.

Before I go - here’s my take on the fractal situation Berk mentioned. The similarity in the pattern is quite obvious and if we bust higher then it’ll probably happen soon. The breach we bears want to see is marked on the chart - we need to see 1050 and even better 1040 on the SPX. Now that would be a drop that would be uncomfortable to the bulls - as it would probably trigger some panic selling. Today was a great step forward and if you’re not short yet, don’t despair - we are only 34 SPX points from the peak - don’t let greed get the better of you and base you trading on TA and not on ‘worried about missing the drop’.

Cheers,

Mole


The Market Sniper

Macro Long-Term Bear Case (by Market Sniper)

(Editor's note: Market Sniper has put together a scintillating read here. I said earlier today I was short gold. My use of GDX and GLD are as very short-term trading vehicles (measured between hours and a few days). I did, as a side note, take handsome profits in GDX and 90% of my GLD shorts today; I am short just 1000 GLD right now, with a much looser stop, and I closed my DZZ trade as well. My point in saying all this is to not be confused by my own use of precious metals ETFs as trading instruments and the "broad view" that Market Sniper is offering below. - - Tim)

I wish to thank our gracious host, TK, for allowing us to post our trades and thoughts on this forum. Though only here on the Slope for a short time, the range of ideas, concepts and abilities demonstrated by individuals in this community has never ceased to amaze. What I propose do do with this post is to present one man's world view that has lead me to an inescapable "bearish" conclusion.

Money

The very basis of the case, I believe, goes to the question of "money": what it is and how it is created. We all use "money" but few understand it.

Money is by its very definition value in exchange. All economic transactions are exchanges; trades, if you will. If employed by another, you trade your time and skills for his "money." That "money" is then used to exchange or trade for goods and services that you want and/or need. Money as used today, throughout the planet, is a debt instrument. It represents debt out of which it is created.

I used to be a real estate appraiser and, from time to time, I would ask the listing broker on a house sale where the broker thought the money came from for the real estate loan in the transaction. Can't remember one who had the correct answer. Correct answer: until the loan was funded, the "money" did not exist in the known universe. The borrower created it when he signed the loan documents. He forged his own chains of debt enslavement. For value in exchange, it is always best for that value to remain constant or as close to constant as possible. How can a man know the value of his own labor if what he is paid for that labor is subject to constant change? How can you have equitable contract law under such conditions? Indeed, how can you maintain an equitable society under such conditions? You cannot.

What can be used for this "constant" value in exchange? Many things have been tried since the dawn of man. Only one thing has stood the test of time: gold. There are many reasons for that which would be a post just in itself. Don't argue with history, learn from it. The very fundamental basis of the system of money we now use is based upon a fundamental fraud. The fraud of central bank (usually private) monetized debt fractional banking money creation or the fiat money (money by government decree) system. What we use as money does not come from wealth or represent wealth. It comes from debt and represents debt. A system that historically has failed without exception.

Previously, such fiat failure was limited to single countries. This time it is different. The fiat system is worldwide. We are in uncharted territory historically in that regard. Fiat failure (currency collapse) leads to riots, rebellions, revolutions, civil wars, governmental terror and all manner of civil mayhem, historically, without exception. Even here in the USA, the collapse of the Continental Dollar lead to rebellion and mayhem but it also lead the the US Constitution. What we see in history is the following: commodity based money system devolves into a fiat money system. Fiat money system collapses and there is a return to a commodity based money system. The pendulum of history swings back and forth.

Cycles

I believe we live at a critical time of cycle confluence. James Dale Davidson and Lord William Rees-Mogg have written a book that I highly recommend you read, The Great Reckoning. They make the case for a 500 year cycle and hypothesized the possible existence of a 2,000 year cycle but there, as yet, is no data to substantiate a 2,000 year cycle. The case for the 500 year cycle is compelling. Going backwards in time: Early 1500's, the formation of the first central bank, the Bank of England; 1066, the Battle of Hastings which forever altered the face of the Western world; 410 AD, the sack of Rome and the year zero which saw the rise of Christianity which also changed the face of the Western world. The next shortest cycle theory available is the Kondratiev Long Wave (or K Wave) Theory. It does have its problems but can be of some benefit. Here is one view of the K waves in action:


Period Date Innovation Saturation point
First Industrial Revolution Circa 1800 – 1850 Cotton based technology; spinning weaving, etc. 1810 –end of Napoleonic Wars
Second Industrial Revolution Circa 1850 – 1900 Age of steam; railways, shipping, heavy industry, iron and steel, etc. 1870s
Third Industrial revolution 1908 – 1947 Petrochemicals, internal combustion engine, electrification. Inter-war slump 1920s and 30s
Post-war Boom 1947 – 1991 Consumer goods, electronics, etc. 1973
Contemporary Era 1991 – present Internet, wireless technology, biotechnology, etc. 2010s

As we drill down, the next shortest cycle period that I follow was developed by Martin Armstrong. The 8.6 year cycle. Armstrong started his work with the Kondratiev Cycle and applied Pi to it. His work can be found on the net in pdf format and is worth a good look. Mr. Armstrong's legal quagmire is convoluted and I will not address that here. Not withstanding, his work has merit. Con man? Quack? Genius? That I leave up to you. I personally consider him the greatest living cycle theorist. Here is Armstrong's cycle:

Armstrong's Cycle

Armstrong's work appears to coincide with Elliot Wave Theory which is calling for a climatic wave down in the super cycle. Perhaps Armstrong's work points to a time frame at the bottom of that wave, mid-year 2011. For a very recent look at Martin Armstrong, there is an article in the October 12, 2009 issue of The New Yorker magazine.

Where We Are Now?

In a dictatorship, the dictator does not care what you think, just what you do (how you act). In the system we have, the ruling elites do not care what you do (there is police function to deal with that), just what you think.

To this end, there is a very well oiled perception manipulation machine in place. It is there to mold what you think.

Prime examples: gold is quoted in the fiat of your choice and appears to rise and fall in value. It does not. The fluctuations you see is actually the perceived value of fiat fluctuating. Gold is a constant measure of wealth and purchasing power. To see the reality, flip it around. Think of it this way: quote fiat in gold. Along the same line, the manipulation machine denigrates non-believers in the fiat fairyland and those who do not believe in modern wizards and alchemists (central bankers) as "gold bugs" and gold as "a barbaric relic." Words have meaning and the negative connotations are obvious.

The manipulation machine goes much further and "spins" economic data, some of which is made up nearly out of whole cloth. Unemployment statistics being a prime example. As Dear Old Dad Used To Say..figures lie and liars figure! I liken what we are seeing and have seen in the very recent past to a force 5 hurricane. The leading edge has now passed through. We are now in the eye of that economic hurricane. In the eye, you look straight up and you see clear skies, your perception manipulated by that machine. What is coming from the trailing edge of that hurricane appears to be even more powerful than what has already passed.

The collapse of many of the toxic weapons of mass financial destruction, the hedge derivative swaps, that triggered recent events are, in notational value, even LARGER than before. We have cycle confluence and a competitive devaluation race to zero in fiat worldwide. The conclusions reached seem fairly obvious to me. What could happen to change my perception? At this point only one thing. A HUGE breakthrough in energy technology. The modern economy is petroleum-based and not sustainable. A relatively inexpensive and plentiful alternative energy source, perhaps a MAJOR breakthrough in fusion technology, could do the trick but that maybe decades away and we are running out of time. Current alternatives are NOT viable as the resources required to allow a transformation away from oil as the energy source are also limited. See Dr. Stephen Leeb's Game Over for an in depth treatment of the subject. We are, in my opinion, about to face a world with a marked decrease in living standards planet wide.

What To Do Now?

Most here on Slope trade with short term time horizons, myself included. As such, our long term bias MUST be left a the door to our trading room.

Longer-term I see that the market is no longer pricing in outlier probabilities and outcomes. As traders, we deal with an unknowable future by thinking in probabilities. Probabilities are distributed on a bell curve with the most probable outcomes centered in the middle of the curve and the least probable outcomes at the ends of the curve (fat tails, outliers or Black Swan probabilities).

We have recently witnessed improbable outcomes come to pass at an increased rate of speed through time. What used to be decades between outliers have become a few years or even months as the bell curve continues to shift to the right. Now fat tail outcomes are almost too horrendous to contemplate. This has created, in my option, a mispriced market. Which way it goes, deflation or hyper inflation cannot be known and a great deal of debate between better minds than I are engaged in that issue.

Play both possible scenarios. Long term, deep out of the money calls and puts in the vehicle of your choice. Could be BOTH trades end up making money.....lots of money. More long term, exchange your depreciating fiat for REAL money every chance you get. Not as a "trade" but as a store of wealth and purchasing power. Get out of debt by any possible means. Those with debt are getting wiped out. Time to get small. If your already small, get smaller. Even longer term? You might want to brush up on your gardening and farming skills. Buy farmland in resource rich countries that will most likely weather the coming storm better than others. Canada and Australia would be prime targets for such an acquisition.

Conclusion

A wise man hedges his downside risks. Hope for the best but prepare for the absolute worst. No surprises then. Nothing would make me happier than to be proven absolutely wrong in my perception. The weight of history tells me that I am not likely to become "happy" however. Please protect yourselves and your families as best you can. It could be that those without gold will not eat. Those without farm-able land may also have trouble with basic survival. What you do NOT want to happen is to go to bed one night and wake up in the morning to a world that has shifted on its axis while you were asleep. A world you will not recognize.


Barry Ritholtz

10 Monday Reads

Its Monday, and that means y’all has gots some readin to do:

Economists Push Employer Tax Break For New Hiring (NPR)

• Andy Xie: Insight: Is China due a reality check? (FT)

Improving Business Conditions, with Pickup in Hiring and Capital Spending Planned over Next Six Months (NABE)

Shipping News May Signal More Reality (WSJ)

Language Lessons at the Fed (Barron’s)

Record NYC real estate deal now on the rocks (AP)

Healthcare system wastes up to $800 billion a year (Reuters)

Seven questions that keep physicists up at night (New Scientist)

Fall Back: Europe Moves to Winter Time, U.S. Changes Clocks Next Weekend (Basex)

Herd Mentality (Daring Fireball)

What are you reading?

The AP has released that Iceland's three McDonalds franchises will close in a week's time, as falling profits and the collapsed Icelandic krona force closure.

Costs have doubled in the past year thanks to the poor economic situation making it too expensive to sell Big Macs in Reykjavik.

The Big Mac currently retails for around $5.29 equivalent, but a hike in prices to make it profitable would have pushed it to $6.36- which would have been the world's most expensive Big Mac, more than Switzerland's and Norway's $5.75 heart clogger according to The Economist's 2009 Big Mac Index rating.

McDonalds has stores in some 119 countries on six contients, and has closed stores due to recessions in several nations in the past. 

I find it interesting how a nation's wealth and expansion is represented on how well it affords the most disgusting, fattening sandwich on a double-cut bun.  Double patty, special sauce and all...  I'd be curious to see the correlation of healthcare costs in these countries to go with the Big Mac Index.    

A hundred billion this week, over a trillion next year, and it starts to add up. It appears that what has been phenomenal strength in the UST market for many months now, undoubtedly with the fervent support of the Federal Reserve, seems to be abating. Over the past week the 2s10s charts has moved stepper by about 15 points, proving that Julian Robertson's steepener trade and its Constant Maturity Swap derivatives will likely end up being quite a profitable position. With a record onslaught of new issuance this week alone, and the expiration of POMO activities on Thursday, the supply side of the equation may finally be catching up bond traders.

From San Francisco Fed Senior Economist John Krainer: Recent Developments in Mortgage Finance
As the U.S. housing market has moved from boom in the middle of the decade to bust over the past two years, the sources of mortgage funding have changed dramatically. The government-sponsored enterprises—Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Ginnie Mae—now own or guarantee an overwhelming share of originations. At the same time, non-agency mortgage securitization and loans retained in lender portfolios have largely dried up.
Mortgage Market Click on graph for slightly larger in new window.

This is figure 3 from the Economic Letter. This shows the surge in non-agency securitized loans, and loans held in bank portfolios, in 2004 through 2006 (the worst loans).
[T]he sources of mortgage finance have shifted as the housing market has gone from boom to bust. Figure 3 plots the evolution of these funding sources over the past decade. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac combined have consistently been the largest players in the market, owning or guaranteeing about half or more of the mortgages in the sample at any given time. Non-agency securitization peaked in the first quarter of 2006, when it accounted for nearly 40% of new originations. Finally, the share of mortgages retained in the originating institution's portfolio averaged about 15% throughout the boom, but has fallen considerably since.
...
In the present day, when Ginnie Mae's activities are included, the three GSEs are providing unprecedented support to the housing market—owning or guaranteeing almost 95% of the new residential mortgage lending.
Although Krainer doesn't mention it, notice the increase in bank portfolio loans in early 2007 - that was probably because the banks were stuck with loans when the securitization market seized up.

Krainer concludes:
With the vast majority of current mortgage lending now intermediated in some form by the GSEs, it will be difficult for the housing market to return to normal.
Note: Tanta wrote this last year on the naming of the GSEs: On Maes and Macs. An excerpt:
Trivia buffs will know that once upon a time there were three "agencies": the Government National Mortgage Association, the Federal National Mortgage Association, and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation. It didn't take all that long for market participants to start coming up with pronunciations for the abbreviations GNMA (Ginnie Mae), FNMA (Fannie Mae), and FHLMC (Freddie Mac, which makes no sense whatsoever except that nobody liked "Filly Mac." ... Old farts whose favorite childhood treat was a box of Pixies will remember the old-time candy company Fannie May, whose name is said to have inspired the whole thing, probably in the throes of a major sugar rush.
Guy M. Lerner

President Obama’s Economic Policy

This morning's sudden sell off on no apparent news must have the Obama economic team in a furor. After 7 months of unrelenting buying, the stock market actually went down. It was a terrifying sell off as the S&P500 lost 2% of its value in less than 60 minutes. This put the 401 k's and IRA's of average Americans at risk. Something must be wrong. What that something was wasn't readily apparent, but the economist in chief was going to get to the bottom of it.

Later that day, President Obama was seen asking the tough questions of his economic advisers in a conference room adjacent to the oval office. This chart was flashed on the far wall. Federal Reserve Chairmain Ben Bernanke said this was a graph depicting strength in the economy, but other more savvy observers said the chart had an uncanny resemblance to a 5 minute bar chart of the S&P500 Depository Receipts (symbol: SPY).

Figure 1. SPY/ 5 minute

Pointing to the area in question (highlighted by the bracket), President Obama said, "What the hell happened here? You guys told me that this thing would never go down. Don't you know that millions of 401 k's and IRA's and the economic vitality of this great nation hangs in the balance?"

Larry Summers spoke up. "Well there was a problem, sir."

President Obama: "You told me that there weren't going to be any problems. What was it?"

Larry Summers again: "Well, it was Tim's day to man the buy button, and apparently, he had to go to the bathroom."

President Obama interrupts: "For 1 hour?"

Mr. Geithner: "Was it really that long?"

President Obama: "Look here (pointing to the chart). That is one hour. That is too much pain. The folks on CNBC were in an absolute panic. How else are we going to show those on Main Street that we are doing a great job?"

Timothy Geithner: "You are doing a great job, sir. If you hadn't spent trillions of dollars, you wouldn't have saved the economy."

President Obama: "That's true Timmy (as he looked at the upward sloping curve on the figure in front of him). I did save the economy. Ben, what do you think we should do?"

Fed Chairman Bernanke: "Drop dollars from helicopters? It has worked before"

Larry Summers: "Been there, done that."

Fed Chairman Bernanke: "I got it. We will call out the air force this time to do the job. We can deliver more money a whole lot quicker. We don't need those army helicopters anyway."

President Obama: "Great idea, Ben. I have been trying to figure out a way to use the military. The air force is always so efficient, and using the military during a crisis is always a good way to bring out patriotism. Someone call the air force, please."

And with that the meeting was adjourned. Mr. Geithner went back to hitting the buy button. Mr. Bernanke went back to his offices to figure out more ways how he can say that America supports the Dollar. Mr. Summers waited in the wings hoping it will be his turn soon to be in control of the buy button.

President Obama strolled back into the oval office confident in knowing that he was at the center of creating America's new found prosperity. That's what the economic charts told him anyway.
Tim Knight

My Leetle Friends

What a day, eh?

Here are a couple of examples of the kinds of shorts I'm loaded up with right now. I'm just gonna let 'em burn. They are, respectively, CAR and STT, and the arrows mark where I shorted them.

1026-car 

1026-stt



The Federal Reserve is unlawfully withholding information from Congress.

Says who?

Says noted economist James Galbraith:

To this day, Chairman Ben Bernanke has refused to disclose to Congress exactly who has received help under the many crisis measures and under what terms. The legal and constitutional situation is clear: Congress has a right to this information. There are no plausible national security concerns.
Galbraith also slams the idea that the Fed should be the main regulator:

Finally, there is the question of financial reform. In the new effort to bring systemically dangerous institutions (now called “Tier One Financial Holding Companies”) under effective supervision, the administration proposes to vest regulation of those entities in the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve naturally agrees. But the Federal Reserve has never been an effective regulator for the straightforward reason that it is dominated by economists and bankers and not by dedicated skeptics who make bank regulation a full-time profession.

If you think Galbraith is wrong about the Fed's capacity to act as regulator-in-chief, look at this article by the Washington Post.

Remember Citi? The bank that once did stuff like investment banking and research, sales and trading, and some other things, and was a little more than just a zombifying and rapidly decaying ward of the state? Neither do we. For a vivid example of how things have changed, Citi today's added BAC stock to its "top picks live" list... and nobody gave a rat's ass. In fact the action in financial stocks was driven more by Dick Bove's earlier downgrade of some regional banks, dragging down such "opportunity" firms as Bank of America with them. Yet Citi knows a thing or two about a thing or two, specifically that BofA, once it is done with all the assorted litigation facing its soon to be ex-CEO, and any potential legal dangers over that other orange guy they got for a steal when they acquired Countrywide, will need to raise capital, especially if its star traders want to be paid for churning the bejeezus out of stocks like Citi, CIT, FNM and FRE (and maybe BAC itself). The amount of the offering will have to be at least $45,000,000,000.99, in order to pay back the $45 billion of government TARP aid still on the books, and the token $0.99 for General Corporate Purposes.

Which is why Keith Horowitz, CFA has decided to take matters into his own hands, sending out the following note to clients "Selloff in BAC Creates Opportunity – Adding to Top Picks Live." Judging by the stock reaction, Mr. Horowitz must have triggered quite a few spam filters.

From the Citi report:

Pay Czar leading to concerns about accelerate TARP repayment — With recent press about compensation curbs, there is heightened concern that BAC will want to accelerate repayment of TARP to defend its capital markets business (this is less of an issue for regionals with more traditional bank business mixes), which is leading to fears of a capital raise. Given the ongoing CEO search, fear of a capital raise only adds to the uncertainty hitting the stock, which creates a very attractive entry point. It is important to differentiate that this capital raise would be viewed as offensive since it would be BAC making decision to repay TARP early, as opposed to defensive capital raises in past.

One imagines this is more a "down the road" issue than anything. Mr. Lewis will have his hands full for quite a while to worry about what his successor will get paid, especially if Mr. Bove continues providing much more "less than instantaneous" reporting on the financial industry.

As for what valuation rabbit out of a hat Citi pulled in order to make BAC the Textron quivalent for Goldman Sachs, here is the insight:

Very Attractive Value Even Under Conservative Assumptions on Capital [apparently Citi's word processing department does not really care much about capitalization guidelines]— We estimate under a conservative scenario, BAC could issue up to $14 billion of capital – this would bring our $3.50 normalized EPS estimate (see Figure 2 for reconciliation) to $3.15 (assuming an issuance price of $14/sh). Based on current prices and our estimates pro forma for capital raise, BAC is trading at 5x normalized EPS or a full 2-multiple-point discount to the group – despite a scenario that that would put capital ratios well ahead of peers, remove TARP, leave strong liquidity, and significantly less CRE exposure than peers. We continue to see BAC as a very valuable franchise capable of generating 20% plus ROTE. Given current prices represent a very attractive entry point (over 50% potential upside to our target) we are adding BAC to Top Picks Live.

And in case you still are not quite convinced, there's this:

Capital under conservative scenario — In Figure 1, we show our methodology on how we arrive at $14 bil capital raise number. The starting point is our estimate that the government will require banks to be at 10.0% Tier 1 capital ratio, and $14 billion is what we est BAC will needs to bridge the gap, with the resulting Tier 1 common ratio coming in at 7.5%. Note that this adjusts for ~50 bp impact of FAS 166/67 as a result of $30 bil of additional RWA, ~$4 bil in after-tax equity impact from additional loan loss reserves for credit card portfolios coming on balance sheet next year, and loss of $4.3 billion from equity warrants related to TARP in the Sept 30 Tier 1 common ratios.

And just because you asked, here are Figures 1 and 2.

Sarcasm aside, with this brilliant piece of probing analysis, Citi has certainly earned its place if not left, then certainly center on the prospectus in the upcoming BofA $45 billion and $1 equity raise. They sure deserve it: one would think Mr. Horowitz' reputation is worth at least the 1% Citi may earn on the offering. After all, in a market which reacts to a Dick call more than a Citi one, one sure needs to raise the stakes a little here and there. Which begs the question: does one semi-nationalized bank deserve to reap underwriting proceeds from issuing equity for another semi-nationalized bank. Cause you see, the thing is that in addition to $45 billion in TARP, Bank of America is on the hook for an addition $56 billion in governmental Intravenous support, courtesy of various AIG support extensions.

Barry Ritholtz

U2 on YouTube – Live from the Rose Bowl

U2 and YouTube broadcast the Irish rock band’s Pasadena concert live last night, for free. And, its now on YouTube.

>

u2 YouTube

From: U2official | October 26, 2009 | 310 views
The world’s greatest band on the world’s largest stage – U2 on YouTube. Watch the rebroadcast of the full live streaming performance from the Rose Bowl. Recorded on Sunday, October 25th.

Hat tip GMSV

Domestic markets seem just a little too claustrophobic recently? The S&P's inability to breach 1,100 got you down? Trading in After Hours not the cash cow it used to be? The fix for gunning stocks ever higher 24 hours a day becoming irresistible? No clue what do with yourself in the hours between 4pm and 9:30 am? Have no fear, Goldman is here. All Goldman clients now have full access to a brand spanking news global heatmapping feature. US looking red, check out China (kinda green). China not doing it for you: Turkey, South Africa and New Zealand seem like a great place to stash cash for the next 10 minutes before the "urge" raises it ugly head.

Unfortunately, if more days like today are the norm, what little humans are left to trade, will be furiously scratching their heads, having to pick lighter shades of red. Alas, there is nothing in the disclaimer the indicates a bias against color blind heat mappers, so you will just have to wait a few days for the PDs to realize that green is so much better for generating outsized trading profits than red.

The dollar will become worthless when people eventually realize the fiscal situation in the U.S. is a "disaster,"said Marc Faber, publisher of the Gloom, Boom & Doom report.

"It will go to a value of zero eventually, but not right now," Faber said today in an interview on Bloomberg Television. "Looking at Mr. Obama's administration, it should already be there. I think it will take about 10 years until people realize that the fiscal situation of the U.S. is a complete disaster."

"In my opinion, about 50 percent of tax revenues will be used just to cover the interest payments on the government debt. That is unsustainable. Then you'll really be forced to print money."


The best investments right now are foreign currencies, commodities and equities, Faber said. Stocks will continue to benefit from the actions of Federal Reserve Chairman, "As soon as the S&P drops to 900 or 800, he will print money again. He's a money printer. He's nothing else."

Marc Faber is an international investor known for his uncanny predictions of the stock market and futures markets around the world. Dr. Doom also trades currencies and commodity futures like Gold and Oil.
Molecool

Dollar Resistance

The ole’ buck seemingly popped a bottle of Canadian Viagra this morning and mustered the equivalent of a currency hard-on:

I would recommend that if you’re long the buck (or short the Euro) you take profits once/if we reach 76.3. Why? Answer currency of 2sweetie’s DXY odds calculator:

As you can see the odds fall off sharply after 76.35 - so plan your trades accordingly.

2:30pm EDT: Here’s my new short term SPY channel for my stainless steel rats:

I would like to see a little bounce here, at least to the center line before I entertain the notion of any short positions, even vertical spreads. Of course if we drop through the lower boundary the jig is up for the bulltards.

UPDATE: 15:00 EDT: Berk here:

Just mentioned this little diddy here to Mole.  Posted it on Saturday, here is the current.

Careful says the fractal...

Careful says the fractal...

All three fractals showed a slight RSI dip in the bottom (no divergence), pushed the lower BB, and met resistance at or above the 1.382 fib extension (1058).  Just a word of warning from the friendly Berk-bear.


Tyler Durden

Intraday Charting

Pretty simple intraday action: crank the dollar, spook everything else. The key correlation charts have been linked at the hip, with the only notable recent outlier being the 10 Year which has been drifting slowly lower, presumably ahead of the $100 billion+ in upcoming coupon issuance.

On the commodity side, same story: dollar leading every asset class. It is time Econ 101 textbooks forget all about that whole supply/demand drivel and just have lesson one (and only) teach all about dollar printing and its consequence on all dollar denominated assets.


Barry Ritholtz

What’s in a Name ?

Paul Krugman’s OpEd column today referred to the tea party extremists participants as “Teabaggers.”

I love that they are now colloquially called Teabaggers by just about everyone, but how on earth did that ever get by the New York Times editors?

The etymology of that word is not exactly NYT fare — see either wikipedia or Urban Dictionary for what it means.

If I define it, this post will never get past the filters!

Tim Knight

Dow 30 on Razor’s Edge

A break beneath 9825 would violate the trendline that has been in place since the Dot Gov bubble was commenced. I am still not going "all out" on shorting. I have about 40% of my buying power (what a misnomer....) deployed. I will get more aggressive if/when things continue to break my way.

1026-dow

This is one of the less helpful things you will read today:

U.S. Stocks Retreat on Concern Housing Tax Credit to Phase Out
Bloomberg, Oct 26 2009

That’s the worst Bloomie headline I’ve seen in a long while. Let’s review some things that, according to this headline writer, are note very relevant.  Examples of what the equity retreat is apparently not based on include:

• An Equity market that has rallied 65% in seven months;

• $80 plus Oil;

• Overhead resistance at 1100

The Tax credit, whose expiration date was well-known to just about everyone since it was conceived, is the cause of the reversal, and not these other factors. (Thanks for the heads up!)

~~~

UPDATE: 7:40pm

OK, now they are just screwing with me . . .

bloomie bad hed

The demand for inflation protection was evident in the Treasury 5 year TIPS auction as while the yield was about in line with expectations, the bid to cover of 3.10 is the highest since they were reintroduced in 2004 and is well above the average seen since ‘04 of 2.12. The implied inflation rate in the 5 year TIPS today is rising a large 13 bps to 1.71%, the highest since June.

  • Yields 0.769% vs. Exp. 0.939%
  • Bid-To-Cover 3.10 vs. Prev. 1.81
  • Indirects 47.8% vs. Prev. 23.73%
  • Indirect Bid-To-Cover 1.53x
  • Allotted at high 38.26%

Over 65, out of work and desperate for a job? So are record numbers of people who thought they would be retired but now find they cannot afford to.

Please consider 65 and Up and Looking for Work.
It is well known that during the nation’s gale-force recession, many older Americans who dreamed of retirement continued to work, often because their 401(k)’s had plunged in value.

In fact, there are more Americans 65 and older in the job market today than at any time in history, 6.6 million, compared with 4.1 million in 2001.

Less well known, though, is that nearly half a million workers 65 and older want to work but cannot find a job — more than five times the level early this decade and this group’s highest unemployment level since the Great Depression.

The expectation once was to pay off your 30-year mortgage before you retired, or come close. Instead, the level of indebtedness among older Americans has risen faster than in any other age group, partly because so many obtained second mortgages to take money out of their homes.

The unemployment rate for older Americans is still much better than for others — 6.7 percent compared with 9.8 percent in the general population. But 6.7 percent is more than double the level of two years ago — and far higher than the minuscule 1.9 percent rate early this decade.

And unemployed older workers stay out of work longer — 36.5 weeks on average, 40 percent longer than for the unemployed in general.

“I often get told that I’m overqualified,” said Barbara Brooks, 71, who retired in 2003 after 30 years as an administrative assistant at the University of California, Los Angeles. She said being told that is code language for “you’re too old.” But Ms. Brooks said she wanted to work — and needed to — citing her monthly mortgage of $1,500, which eats up half her monthly pension.
65 and Over Unemployment Rate Highest In History



Tables Turned, Former Hirers Can’t Get Hired

Inquiring minds are reading Tables Turned, Former Hirers Can’t Get Hired
NANCY FINK is a career coach for Maryland’s department of labor, running seminars for the most skilled unemployed workers.

For 17 years, she has counseled professionals, business managers, engineers, accountants, scientists — people who are mature, middle-aged, highly motivated, well-educated, well-spoken. But in all that time, she’s never seen so many of the jobless with such impressive skills as this last year. “Last week I had seven lawyers in this room,” she said. “I’ve had lots of folks from TV and The Baltimore Sun. This week I’ve got five human resources directors — I’ve never had that.”

They ask questions young workers don’t. David Kozlowski, 52, a systems vice president laid off in June, wanted to know how far back to go when an interviewer inquires about his work experience in information technology. “I’ve had 30 years in I.T.,” he said.

During a discussion on cover letters, Ms. Fink wondered if the human resources directors in the room had any thoughts. “It can make a big difference,” said Hal Hamil Jr., 56, unemployed since August, but before then, a senior vice president of PNC Bank making $130,000 a year. Mr. Hamil said that last March he posted three openings for tellers paying $10 an hour and got 1,008 applications. “I hired two of them because of their cover letters,” he said.

Ms. Fink warned: “You could find yourself being interviewed by a millennial. As a boomer, you’re thinking that could be my kid. Your instinct is to use their first name. Don’t. They could have an M.B.A. from Wharton. It should be Ms. or Mr.”

They discussed how to respond when an interviewer asked them to describe a weakness.

“Can you say ‘I don’t have a weakness,’ ” Ms. James, the contractor said. “‘I’m just even-keeled’?”

“No, no,” Ms. Fink said, “you need a weakness that’s not really a weakness — they want to see you dance around the question.”

After the seminar, Ms. Fink said a lot of what she does is therapy — helping worried people feel less isolated.

Her boss, Stephen Gallison, who directs the program for skilled workers known as the Professional Outplacement Assistance Center, said that in the past people typically found jobs within five months, but in this economy that’s not a reliable gauge. Asked if he saw any hopeful signs, he said: “No. Nothing. Not yet.”
Interview Tips From The Article

  • Attach a cover letter to your resume.
  • Be prepared to mention a weakness.
  • Be prepared to answer the question "Tell me about yourself."
  • Send a thank you letter after the interview.
  • Don't use first names even if the person hiring is half your age and looks like your son or daughter. They could have an M.B.A. from Wharton.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List

Nächste Einträge »